Welcome to CAHNet

Welcome to CAHNet- click to go home

Record of Surveillance Subcommittee Teleconference
June 25, 1998, 1:30
See list of attendees, attached

Issue Discussion and Preferred Options Who/Next Steps?
1 CAHNet Roles and Responsibilities

Issue: The goal of the Canadian Animal Health Network (CAHNet) is to link federal-provincial-private animal disease surveillance partners in Canada to ensure that animal disease does not impede trade. This goal benefits all stakeholders and no single group has the resources to adequately perform all the necessary functions required to achieve it.

Discussion: Some concern expressed that inadequate information available on CAHNet goals and, hence, expectations of members. A parallel was drawn in terms of the animal identification initiative in which federal government is standard setter, industry implementer.

Preferred Option A working group will be formed to examine the potential roles and responsibilities and come back to the committee with a prosposal. Most respondants favoured some formal document outlining expectations on all sides. Perhaps the solution will be a statement of principles, such as the Alberta-CFIA "Principles" (attached). Specific working groups formed could have an agreement with more detail in the requirements.

Committee Link

- Martine Dubuc & Michel Major

CAHNet Support

- André Doré

Next Steps

1. Determine working group membership

2. Develop terms of reference and action plan with group by August

#2 Surveillance Standards

Issue: The provinces vary in terms of the depth of information they have on hand for responding to animal disease inquiries. National statements on animal health status, made in response to requests from trading partners, would carry more validity if accompanied by a description of the surveillance standards on which they were based.

Discussion: In theory, all participants see the value of setting standards but some question around how it could be done. Clearer when taken on a disease by disease basis.

Preferred Option A working group will incrementally develop surveillance standards, probably first with respect to selected diseases. In the long term, may validate some zoning criteria which will protect trade in parts of the country in the event of disease incursions in others.



Committee Link

- Sandra Honour

CAHNet Support

- John Kellar

Next Steps

1. Develop working group membership

2. Develop terms of reference and action plan with group by August

3 Internet site for CAHNet

Issue: Would CAHNet be enhanced by development and maintenance of an Internet site?

Discussion: Concern from two quarters: security and workload. CCA expressed strong support in terms of the visibility offered.

Preferred Option Contract UPEI so Support Group workload not a concern. All material posted will be reviewed by Committee to offset security concern.

CAHNet Support Group:

Carolyn Inch (September)

1. Send committee a list of proposed documents for posting.

2. Complete paperwork to pay UPEI the $1000 to start site development

4 Handling enquiries on specific diseases

Issue:

CFIA's veterinarians certify freedom from specific diseases to enable the export of animals and animal products. In certain cases, they certify for diseases not covered by federal surveillance.

Discussion: Development is stepwise and with time, trust will be build. Noted that various parts of the country have different commodity strengths and interests.

Preferred Option

In the longer term want to have a formal agreement among CAHNet partners to clarify in advance the conditions for collaboration. (Not too restrictive to deal with varying scenarios.) In the interim, when there is a disease inquiry, it will be dealt with by the Surveillance Subcommittee on an ad hoc basis.

Refer to Roles and Responsibilties working group
5 CAHNET Cards - Fostering a sense of membership in CAHNet

Issue: Large animal practitioners, and to some extent producers, are our first window of opportunity to detect new or emerging diseases. To build on the awareness, a wallet-sized CAHNet surveillance card containing contact names could be distributed.

Discussion: Premeeting feedback had indicated support but not a priority. Suggestion that cards be piggybacked on provincial membership cards. Question /concern about 1-800 number and FAD. Again would be a piggyback on existing system.

Preferred Option: Not enough information to base discussion. Not extremely contentious. Group could provide feedback on prototype.

CAHNet Support Group:

Wayne Lees

Actions:

1. Contact provincial vet associ. about potential for piggyback

2. Send out optional prototype to Committee members

6 Maximizing the Surveillance Contribution of Veterinary Laboratories

Issue: Introduction of user fees, downsizing of laboratory services, budgetary freezes, the advent of private laboratories and increased movement of diagnostic samples across borders have all played a role in eroding confidence in the traditional passive surveillance system.

Discussion: Diagnostic approach undertaken in Alberta discussed - some controversy. Private laboratory data a concern.

Preferred Option Formation of a working group to develop an action plan to approach the problem. May involve MOUs and increased funding

Committee Link

- David Alves

CAHNet Support

Wayne Lees

Next Steps

1. Develop working group membership

2. Develop terms of reference and action plan by August

7 Resources Issue

How to find additional resources beyond our respective organizations and make better use of those that we have

Discussion: Discussion around Matching Investment Initiative funds as sources for surveillance. Could be 'in kind' payment.

Preferred Option Both mximize our collaborative efforts and fnding additional funding sources for surveillance activities are preferred. A small working group will look at these questions.

Committee Link

?

CAHNet Support

- John Kellar

Next Steps

1. Develop working group

2. Develop terms of reference and action plan by August

Participants Present:

Name/Organization Representing Phone number
Martin Rice, Canadian Pork Council Swine industry
Glenn Cherry, Holstein Canada Dairy Industry
John Speed, Canadian Sheep Federation Small Ruminant Industry
Rob McNabb, Canadian Cattlemen's Assoc. Beef Industry
Sue Koerfer, Canadian Equestrian Federation Equine Industry
Sandra Honour, Alberta Agriculture Provincial Government
Martine Dubuc & Michel Major, MAPAQ Provincial Government
David Alves, OMAFRA Provincial Government
Wayne Martin, OVC Veterinary Universities
Ted Leighton, CCWHC Wildlife
Stephen Scott, CVMA Private Veterinarians
Bill Anderson for

Ron Rogers, AHPD, CFIA

Canadian Meat Council and other ancillary org.
Paul Shadbolt for

Peter Hunton, Ontario Egg Producers

Poultry industry
Alain Moreau for

Bill Anderson, Montreal Region CFIA

Federal field staff
John Kellar, CAHNet Support Group CFIA

André Doré

Wayne Lees

Christine Power

Carolyn Inch

Federal laboratories

Absent and unrepresented:

Ian Thorleifson, Canadian Vension Council Game Ranches and Zoos

Developmental Activities | Investigational Activities | Communications Activities | Home